As a candidate, Trump issued three statements about his medical health:
Comment: Incredibly, these physical examinations, which one would expect to be routine, staid affairs, took on circus-like characteristics:
Hence, four times in three years confidence in the office of the President's physician was undermined -- a low ebb in its history. Even if one credulously believes that the President's medical team has been completely and honestly forthcoming, all this sturm und drang is itself dangerous, as it can easily detract from substantive medical issues -- as it already seems to have done with Trump's sleep.
This is the publicly-released report of President Trump's physical examination of January 12, 2018.
Comment:



|
Comment: Also includes annotations by Cillizza and Blake. Their interview transcript is archived here: MORE |
|
Comment: Dr. Bornstein became Trump's physician in 1980. Bornstein's letter is linked to by Frizell (op cit) and is archived here --> MORE |
|
Comment: This articles relates to the first of Dr. Bornstein's letters, reprinted here --> MORE |
|
Comment: The document is archived here --> MORE. Also highly informative is the press briefing where the report was delivered: MORE. |
|
Comment: A transcript of the press briefing is archived here --> MORE |
|
Comment: The document is archived here --> MORE |
|
Comment: The document is archived here --> MORE |
|
Comment: The document is unacceptably vague about dates. For example, it is not possible to determine on what date between Nov. 2019 and April 2020 the President's weight was measured. The document is archived here --> MORE |
There are, however, multiple identifiable instances where the truth has been stretched, omitted, or garbled:
- The President's height was exaggerated.
- The "stamina" discussion (in the press briefing) omits Trump's admitted exhaustion in May 2017.
- The abdominal exam was described as "normal" but of course the exam was abnormal for obesity.
- Only one visual acuity reading is provided, and it is not stated whether it is
for near-vision or distance-vision. Presumably it is distance-vision and the much
worse near-vision acuity was deliberately suppressed.
- Coronary calcium scores were omitted from the report but disclosed in
response to a press question. The physician stumblingly appeared to say that he
thought the scores were not significant, but of course they are.
While minor in themselves, these issues are a reminder that, without defined standards for the Presidential medical examination, the public will never truly know the President's state because it is just so simple to tailor the message as desired, by omitting information. Here we see a clear bias toward suppressing data showing even a hint of abnormality.The other major fault is the lack of formal sleep assessment -- a pretty large lacuna.